ASA Takes Shears To Hairburst Ad Claims; Volume & Growth Elixir Will Need Name Change
Hairburst’s hair-growth and hair-loss prevention claims on cosmetic products are inadequately substantiated, and many of the health claims it uses to promote food supplements are unauthorized, the Advertising Standards Authority says in a 14 Aug. decision.
You may also be interested in...
The Capillus82 Hair Regrowth Laser Cap may be "substantially equivalent" to the manufacturer's Capillus272 Pro device, based on FDA's 510(k) clearance, but NAD says hair-growth clinical findings from that "predicate" device cannot serve to substantiate claims for the untested Capillus82. The case illustrates complexities in the medical device segment, which increasingly is of interest to cosmetics companies.
The Advertising Standards Authority says Cocoa Locks' hair-growth promises for its hot chocolate mix exceed authorized food health claims registered in the EU. The company’s business may need a major overhaul, down to its brand tagline, “Hair Growth Never Tasted So Good.”
The final opinion of ECHA’s Socio-Economic Analysis Committee, published on 1 March, is largely unchanged from its July 2020 draft opinion with regard to microplastic in cosmetic products. That means industry may have to convince EU member state authorities that the restriction proposal has a serious proportionality problem.