Endocrine Disruptors, The European Green Deal And The Politicization Of EU Chemical Programs
John Chave, director-general at Cosmetics Europe, says the European Commission’s plan for targeted assessment of 28 potential endocrine-disruptors in cosmetics – despite its conclusion in late 2018 that the current cosmetics regulatory framework adequately addresses endocrine-disruptor concerns – is symptomatic of a broad trend taking hold in Europe.
You may also be interested in...
EU Scientific Committee Affirms Safety Of Anti-Dandruff Zinc Pyrithione Under Threat Of Cosmetic Ban
The Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety upholds that zinc pyrithione is safe for use in rinse-off anti-dandruff hair products at levels up to 1%. In recent years, the cosmetics industry has pushed for a 2% ceiling on ZPT content in that capacity – with considerable inroads made. Where that proposal now stands vis-à-vis the ingredient’s pending CMR 1B classification and shifting political sands is uncertain.
The European Commission issued requests on 4 February for updated opinions from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety on octocrylene, homosalate and benzophenone-3, in light of concerns that led to their listing in 2019 as “higher priority” substances used in cosmetics with endocrine-disrupting potential.
As European industry’s concerns grow about “politicization” of regulatory programs, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement’s cosmetics annex directs regulatory authorities pursuing new rules to give due consideration to scientific and technical guidance documents developed through international collaboration.