Huda Beauty Flouts US Law With Neon Obsession, Ahem, ‘Multiuse Pigments’ – Class Action
Executive Summary
Huda Beauty clearly intends for its Neon Obsession color palettes to be used as eyeshadow, despite a “hidden disclaimer” contraindicating the products for eye-area use, according to the plaintiff in a proposed class action filed in California’s Central District.
You may also be interested in...
Huda Beauty To Settle Class Action Over Eyeshadows ‘Not Intended For The Eye Area'
US consumers who purchased Neon Obsession pressed pigment palettes may be entitled to refunds under a settlement preliminarily approved in California’s Central District. Plaintiffs say Huda promoted Neon Obsession as eyeshadow despite use of color additives not approved by the FDA for eye-area use, an issue that cannot be cured by a “buried” disclaimer on product packaging.
US Plaintiffs Branching From Natural To Clean-Type Claims, Attorneys Warn At PCPC Virtual Summit
Are botanical claims equivalent to natural claims? Can hair truly be repaired? What constitutes “oil-free”? Such are the questions raised in growing litigation against cosmetic product companies under consumer protection statutes around the US, Conkle, Kremer & Engel attorneys say.
Neon Eye Makeup Not Intended For Eyes? Internet Reacts To Seeming Labeling-Marketing Contradictions
Recent discussion in the media about the rise of neon eyeshadow palettes, seemingly without any of the necessary FDA-approved colorants to make them possible, has given rise to safety and regulatory compliance questions. Naturally, some consumers are outraged, while others seem reluctant to raise a stink to the detriment of makeup options.