HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

CIR Expert Panel Rebranded Ahead Of June Virtual Meeting

Executive Summary

The renamed Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety has its own website now, which includes the conflict of interest statement its members are expected to sign. The panel will meet virtually 8-9 June to consider a raft of ingredient reports in various stages of development at Cosmetic Ingredient Review.

You may also be interested in...



CIR Expert Panel Affirms Safety Of Preservative MI, Reaches Decisions On Five Ingredients From Nature

At their 8-9 June meeting, CIR’s independent experts tentatively found methylisothiazolinone safe for use in rinse-off cosmetic products up to 100 ppm and safe in leave-on cosmetic products when formulated to be non-sensitizing, maintaining their more tolerant position on the preservative compared with the EU. More results.

Non-Hygiene Personal Care ‘Essential’ In California … For Now; COVID-19 Event Impacts; Cosmetics News In Brief

Santa Monica, CA-based law firm Conkle, Kremer and Engle warns that while all personal-care product businesses appear to be designated “essential” in the Golden State under its statewide “stay at home” order, officials could decide that the policy does not apply to manufacturers of non-hygiene products. More cosmetics news in brief.

Cosmetic Safety Enhancement Act Advances In US House, Still Without Preemption

Approved by the House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee on 11 March, H.R. 5279 still lacks any concrete provisions regarding federal preemption of state and local requirements, though bill author and full committee chair Frank Pallone, D-NJ, remains committed to discussions on the subject. He recognized preemption as “a major issue that I know we have to deal with.”

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

OM013057

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel