FDA Clarification: Interagency Recommendations On Talc-Asbestos Test Methods Not Formal Guidance
The Executive Summary of an interagency working group's preliminary recommendations on testing methods for asbestos in talc and talc-containing consumer products, released by the FDA in early 2020, does not constitute a formal position taken by the FDA, it says, noting that concerns have arisen recently about misunderstanding among "external parties."
You may also be interested in...
Fitzgerald has parted ways with Greensboro, NC-based Scientific Analytical Institute, but his investigations continue into asbestos contamination risks, including in talc-containing cosmetics, at his own lab and consultancy in Durham, NC, Fitzgerald Analytical Consulting & Testing Services, PLLC.
The FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition has a wish list for cosmetics reform legislation, but with Congress currently focused elsewhere, the agency is using its existing authority and resources to address cosmetics safety priorities while working to drive voluntary industry support.
The Environmental Working Group and Scientific Analytical Institute say inadequate testing of talc-containing personal-care products is to blame for findings of asbestos in cosmetics, including three of 21 powder-based cosmetics SAI analyzed at EWG’s request. They continue to push for updated testing standards that include electron microscopy as a core component.