HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Did California Catch Brazilian Blowout Napping? Formaldehyde Must Be Out Of Hair Smoothers By 2025

Executive Summary

California-based Brazilian Blowout appears not to have opposed the Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act, signed into law in the Golden State at the end of September, which will ban a key ingredient in its professional hair-smoothing systems beginning 1 January 2025. The company remains oddly quiet about the legislation, which was backed by NGOs, public health advocates and other cosmetic industry reps.

Few cosmetic brands in recent memory have been as controversial and condemned as Brazilian Blowout.

After settlements with consumers and the California attorney general’s office in 2012 for allegedly misrepresenting the Brazilian Blowout professional hair-smoothing formula and the risks it may pose to users, the company’s CEO Mike Brady characterized the outcome as a triumph.

“We get to sell the product forever without reformulation,” he told The New York Times. (Also see "Brazilian Blowout Manufacturer Required To Label, Warn Users" - HBW Insight, 6 Jan, 2014.)

He may not have counted on the Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act (TFCA), enacted at the end of September, which will render cosmetic products adulterated in California if they contain formaldehyde or methylene glycol, among other ingredients, beginning 1 January 2025.

Methylene glycol – formaldehyde in liquid form – is a key ingredient in Brazilian Blowout’s professional hair-smoothing formulas. When heated during the hair-straightening process, the substance converts to formaldehyde gas, potentially putting salon workers and customers at risk of harmful exposure, critics say.

“They must not pay attention to legislation?” – WVE’s Jamie McConnell on lack of opposition to AB 2762
In an October post to Women’s Voices for the Earth’s website, the NGO’s deputy director Jamie McConnell celebrates the TFCA’s coming impact on cosmetic products in California, including those sold for professional use only, focusing on hair straightener implications in particular.

“This is a huge win for salon workers whose health has suffered as a result of popular hair-straightening treatments such as Brazilian Blowout. Salon workers across the country have reported difficulty breathing, bloody noses, headaches, rashes, chronic sinus and lung infections and more as the result of the use of hair straighteners in their salons,” McConnell says.

Further, the WVE deputy director believes the California law, AB 2762, will have nationwide influence, potentially accomplishing what the US Food and Drug Administration has neglected to do, in the eyes of many, to keep consumers and stylists safe. (Also see "US Rep. Pallone Demands Answers From FDA On Seeming Hair-Smoothing Formaldehyde Ban ‘Reversal’" - HBW Insight, 27 Oct, 2020.)

WVE was among a number of nonprofits that supported the TFCA including the Environmental Working Group, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners and Black Women for Wellness.

The bill also received backing from physician groups, cosmetics companies, such as Beautycounter and California Baby, Inc., as well as trade association the Personal Care Products Council.

Curiously, the legislation in its final stages was completely unopposed. Earlier drafts of the bill met with opposition from industry organizations, including PCPC, Fragrance Creators Association and American Chemistry Council, as well as Sacramento, CA-based law firm McHugh Koepke & Associates.

It is not clear whom McHugh & Associates was representing. At any rate, all opposition appears to have evaporated by late May as the TFCA evolved into a blacklisting of selected cosmetic ingredients that are already prohibited from use in cosmetics in the European Union. (Also see "California Bill Advances To Ban Cosmetic Ingredients Prohibited In EU, With PCPC’s Backing" - HBW Insight, 15 May, 2020.) 

Headquartered in the Los Angeles city of Agoura Hills, GIB, LLC, dba Brazilian Blowout, was never once listed as an opponent of AB 2762 in California legislative analysis documents.

At least a thousand salons in California currently offer Brazilian Blowout services, based on results from the salon locator tool on Brazilian Blowout’s website.

The company’s product portfolio has grown over the years to include volumizing shampoo and conditioner and styling products for consumers, as well as additional offerings for professionals.

However, Brazilian Blowout’s core business continues to revolve around its methylene glycol-containing hair-straightening and defrizzing formulas, namely the Original Smoothing Solution and Express Smoothing Solution.

Brazilian Blowout Zero+, a plant-based alternative launched in 2011 with the claim “0% formaldehyde before, during or after the treatment,” received lackluster reviews online and appears to have been discontinued.

Brazilian Blow No-Show

Why Brazilian Blowout did not lodge opposition to the TFCA, and where the company goes from here, are unknowns. The firm did not respond to repeated attempts by HBW Insight to get answers.

A PCPC spokesperson noted in an email that GIB/Brazilian Blowout is not a PCPC member.

PCPC was pleased with the direction taken with AB 2762, specifically its alignment with European ingredient prohibitions under the EU’s Cosmetic Products Regulation, applauding Governor Gavin Newsom’s signing of the bill on 30 September. (Also see "California Will Prohibit Use Of Some Cosmetic Ingredients Banned In Europe Beginning in 2025" - HBW Insight, 30 Sep, 2020.)

Regarding the law’s implications for hair smoothers, the PCPC rep said the group supports the 2011 conclusion of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel that formaldehyde or methylene glycol’s use in heated hair-straightening products is unsafe in current practices and concentration levels. (Also see "CIR Expert Panel On Formaldehyde Hair Straighteners: “Unsafe”" - HBW Insight, 4 Jul, 2011.)

Brazilian Blowout's Original Smoothing Solution with methylene glycol

While Brazilian Blowout is best-known, other hair-straightening brands are still using formaldehyde/methylene glycol in their products, according to WVE’s McConnell.

“I also find it very odd that the hair straightening industry didn’t oppose the legislation, in particular Brazilian Blowout, which is based in California,” she said in an email. “I have no explanation for this other than they must not pay attention to legislation?”

McConnell concluded, “Regardless, hair straighteners are regulated as cosmetics, and as such, come 2025, the products will no longer be able to contain formaldehyde. And, you can bet advocates will be testing products to ensure compliance!”

Potentially in Brazilian Blowout’s favor, late changes to the TFCA revised the way the law will be enforced, reducing the role of the California Department of Public Health and placing the onus on the attorney general, district attorneys, or qualifying county or city attorneys to seek court-ordered injunctions against violators. (Also see "California’s Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act Amended, Pushed Closer To Governor’s Desk" - HBW Insight, 26 Aug, 2020.)

Violators also will face less severe monetary penalties, and no criminal penalties, under the TFCA as chaptered, compared with previous drafts of the legislation, a legislative staffer told HBW Insight.

Related Content

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS150725

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel