Cosmetics Europe Talks Microplastic: ECHA Frustrations, ‘Value Judgments’ And International Trade Uncertainty
Executive Summary
The European Chemicals Agency's microplastic restriction proposal received committee backing in 2020 without changes sought by the cosmetics industry, which faces €15bn in projected costs and scarce alternatives at present. It may come down to EU Member States to decide whether the ECHA restriction proposal is proportionate in balancing environmental goals and socio-economic impacts.
You may also be interested in...
US States Take Aim At Microplastics Among ‘Overwhelming’ Number Of Bills With Cosmetics Relevance
Plastic concerns loom large in a growing patchwork of legislative proposals at the US state level with implications for cosmetics businesses.
Can Beauty Industry Do Without Microplastic? L’Oreal Signals Confidence In Green Chemistry Future
L’Oreal aims to transform its Research & Innovation by 2030 in line with consumer demand for greener, more natural beauty products. But some ingredients will be much harder to replace than others.
European SEAC Opinion Unchanged: Microplastics Must Be Out Of All Cosmetics Within Six Years
The final opinion of ECHA’s Socio-Economic Analysis Committee, published on 1 March, is largely unchanged from its July 2020 draft opinion with regard to microplastic in cosmetic products. That means industry may have to convince EU member state authorities that the restriction proposal has a serious proportionality problem.