Huda Beauty To Settle Class Action Over Eyeshadows ‘Not Intended For The Eye Area'
Executive Summary
US consumers who purchased Neon Obsession pressed pigment palettes may be entitled to refunds under a settlement preliminarily approved in California’s Central District. Plaintiffs say Huda promoted Neon Obsession as eyeshadow despite use of color additives not approved by the FDA for eye-area use, an issue that cannot be cured by a “buried” disclaimer on product packaging.
You may also be interested in...
First Huda, Now Morphe Faces Proposed Nationwide Class Action Over Eyeshadow Colors
A class action in California federal court targets Morphe Cosmetics for the sale and marketing of eyeshadows containing unapproved colors for eye-area use that three consumers say inflicted physical injury. They seek to represent consumers nationwide, citing breach of warranties, negligence, false advertising, and other claims.
Huda Beauty Flouts US Law With Neon Obsession, Ahem, ‘Multiuse Pigments’ – Class Action
Huda Beauty clearly intends for its Neon Obsession color palettes to be used as eyeshadow, despite a “hidden disclaimer” contraindicating the products for eye-area use, according to the plaintiff in a proposed class action filed in California’s Central District.
Unilever’s Dove Recommits To ‘Real Women’ Against Rising AI Threat
Unilever PLC’s Dove and Baby Dove brands continue tackling prominent social causes with a vow to be responsible about representing women realistically in advertising in the age of AI and a renewed commitment to closing the Black maternal care gap.