HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

First Huda, Now Morphe Faces Proposed Nationwide Class Action Over Eyeshadow Colors

Executive Summary

A class action in California federal court targets Morphe Cosmetics for the sale and marketing of eyeshadows containing unapproved colors for eye-area use that three consumers say inflicted physical injury. They seek to represent consumers nationwide, citing breach of warranties, negligence, false advertising, and other claims.

You may also be interested in...



ColourPop Suit Challenging Unapproved Colorants In Eye Makeup Goes To Ninth Circuit

“The Court can’t make a decision the FDA itself did not make,” wrote US district judge Trina Thompson in her 7 September order dismissing plaintiff Kacey Wilson’s second amended complaint against ColourPop. At issue is the company’s use of color additives in eye makeup products that the US FDA has not approved for eye-area use, but also has not determined are likely to cause injuries, according to the court.

CIR Hair-Dye Assessments Strike On Unapproved Colorant Uses; FDA’s Cosmetics Office Has Eye On It

Cosmetic Ingredient Review’s independent experts considered hair dyes in unapproved applications in its 163rd meeting, prompting commentary from US FDA leadership on hand.

Huda Beauty To Settle Class Action Over Eyeshadows ‘Not Intended For The Eye Area'

US consumers who purchased Neon Obsession pressed pigment palettes may be entitled to refunds under a settlement preliminarily approved in California’s Central District. Plaintiffs say Huda promoted Neon Obsession as eyeshadow despite use of color additives not approved by the FDA for eye-area use, an issue that cannot be cured by a “buried” disclaimer on product packaging.

Related Content

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS152546

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel