Sephora Well-Positioned To Defend ‘Clean Beauty’ Case, Attorney Says
Executive Summary
Sephora USA is in a strong position to defend its ‘Clean at Sephora’ designation for certain products because it is transparent about what the claim means, and the plaintiff in the case may not be able to show that a reasonable consumer would be misled, says Angela Diesch, partner in the Los Angeles office of Amin Talati Wasserman, LLP.
You may also be interested in...
Plaintiff Puts ‘Clean Beauty’ To Test In Federal Court In Sephora USA Case
The class action complaint in New York federal court suggests a parity between “clean” and natural claims in the understanding of beauty consumers.
Not So Clean Beauty? False Advertising Lawsuits Allege PFAs In CoverGirl, BareMinerals Products
Coty’s and Shiseido’s respective CoverGirl and BareMinerals, both self-proclaimed creators of the clean beauty movement, deceive consumers with their toxic-free, good-for-the-planet advertising into buying PFAS-laced cosmetic products, plaintiffs allege in recent complaints. Plaintiffs against Coty point to the company’s Sustainability Report as further evidence that its promises and practices don’t line up.
Ulta Elevates Clean Beauty With Certification Program, Ingredient Standard
Conscious Beauty, launching at Ulta in the fall, is built around five pillars for product certification – clean ingredients, cruelty free, vegan, sustainable packaging and positive impact. Clean ingredients means no parabens, phthalates or listed ingredients in 25 other categories, the retailer says.