Still Can’t Cancel That Gym Membership? FTC Proposes One Negative Option Rule To Rule Them All
Commission proposes to modernize, expand, and rename its outdated and underpowered Negative Option Rule
Executive Summary
The FTC published a notice of proposed rulemaking on 23 March to update its 1973 Negative Option Rule, which has become obsolete vis-à-vis new marketing strategies in today’s digital world. Proposed amendments would clarify, expand and consolidate negative option-related provisions currently dispersed across different FTC laws and regulations.
You may also be interested in...
FTC v. Amazon Is ‘Dark Patterns’ Case To Watch
Amazon’s motion to dismiss is pending in Washington State’s Western District in litigation concerning Prime subscriptions and alleged “dark patterns” used to trick consumers into enrolling and hinder cancellations, according to the US Federal Trade Commission. The case could be instructive for any and all digital marketers at a time of legal uncertainty surrounding the topic.
Negative Option Scam Costs Skin Cream Operation $34M, Lifetime Ban In Settlement With FTC
Defendant Gopalkrishna Pai and eight of at least 100 interrelated companies he owns agree to a lifetime ban on negative option marketing and a $34m settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, partially suspended based on inability to pay. The FTC says the settlement sends a "strong message to other unscrupulous marketers."
Nutrafol Hair Growth Ads Trigger TINA.org Complaint To Federal Agencies
Ad watchdog group Truth in Advertising, Inc. filed a complaint with the US FDA and FTC over Nutrafol hair growth supplement representations that the organization says are unapproved drug claims and/or don’t meet FTC standards for adequate substantiation, as well as alleged deceptive negative option practices.