HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Aleve data vs. Advil shows "trend" toward longer action, court says in rejecting AHP suit.

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

ALEVE CLINICAL DATA VS. ADVIL SHOWS "TREND" TOWARD LONGER ACTION, U.S. District Court Judge Nicholas Politan said Dec. 27 in deny-ing American Home Products' request for a preliminary injunction against Procter-Syntex. Politan stated that "it is patent" from evaluating three studies comparing the pain relief duration of naproxen sodium and ibuprofen with placebo over a 12-hour period that the "consistent trends of all three studies strongly suggest that naproxen sodium, that is, Aleve, has a longer duration and is more efficacious at the later hours (i.e., hours 8 through 12) than Advil."

You may also be interested in...



Aleve Challenge, New Study Catch Up To Advil 'Works Longer' Claim In NAD Review

Although 1993 studies to make Aleve available OTC didn't support claiming the naproxen oral analgesic lasted longer than ibuprofen-containing Advil, 2018 study Bayer submitted for National Advertising Division review shows Advil's efficacy doesn't exceed Aleve's. Report also says while Pfizer criticized inpatient methodology of Bayer's study, inpatient is industry standard method for pain medication trials.

Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010

Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC

In Brief

Combe sells most of its OTC brands

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS145291

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel