Concept Labs Hair Growth Inhibition Claims Unsubstantiated, NAD
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
Ads claiming hair growth inhibition for Concept Laboratories Roll-On Hair Remover are unsubstantiated because of insufficient product testing, the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus states in its March NAD Case Reports.
You may also be interested in...
ProCede Implied Hair Growth Claims Should Be Modified – NAD
Youth Enhancement Systems should modify implied claims that ProCede hair thickener causes "significant and dramatic hair growth," the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus concludes in a recent Case Reports
ProCede Implied Hair Growth Claims Should Be Modified – NAD
Youth Enhancement Systems should modify implied claims that ProCede hair thickener causes "significant and dramatic hair growth," the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus concludes in a recent Case Reports
Thane Hair Removal Claims Overstated, Need Modification - NAD
Performance claims for Thane International's Alexandria Body Sugaring hair removal system should be modified "to avoid overstating the inhibition of hair regrowth that consumers can expect with the use of the product," the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus says in its January NAD Case Reports.