HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Kmart

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Closing of 284 under-performing stores will improve firm's earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation by about $31 mil. annually, Kmart reports in 1March 8 release. Stores, which will remain open until pending approval of plan by Chicago Bankruptcy Court, include 271 Kmart and 12 Supercenter outlets in 40 states and Puerto Rico. Move will enhance Kmart's cash flow by about $550 mil. in 2002 and $45 mil. annually thereafter. Retailer expects to take charge of $1.1 bil.-$1.3 bil., and eliminate 22,000 jobs. Annoucement marks one of first steps taken under reorganization following Chapter 11 filing in January (2"The Rose Sheet" Jan. 21, 2002, p. 5)...

You may also be interested in...



Kmart bankruptcy

Retailer will proceed with closing 283 stores after receiving approval from Chicago Bankruptcy Court, Kmart announces March 21. Store closings are expected to improve earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization by $31 mil. annually (1"The Rose Sheet" March 11, 2002, In Brief)...

Kmart Hits Red Light; Financial Options Under Review

Kmart Corporation is reviewing its business plan and liquidity options after announcing Jan. 10 that it would not reach earnings expectations in fiscal 2002 (ending Jan. 30)

California Court’s Inaction On TiO2 Prop 65 First Amendment Case Breeds New Lawsuits

The Personal Care Products Council seeks to stem the rising tide of titanium dioxide Proposition 65 lawsuits, requesting that a California court prohibit the state’s Attorney General and private enforcers from filing and/or prosecuting new suits against cosmetics companies failing to warn about potential TiO2 exposure.

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS010104

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel