HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Anticaries Alternative Test Review Should Include Multiple Methods – CTFA

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

FDA should evaluate multiple alternative test methods in addition to the Intraoral Appliance (IOA) model as it considers non-animal test methods for OTC anticaries products, the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association and Consumer Healthcare Products Association Joint Anticaries Task Group says

You may also be interested in...



Anticaries test alternatives

Inclusion of validated in vitro pH cycling model in the OTC Anticaries Products Monograph as alternative to animal caries testing is urged by Procter & Gamble. Intraoral Appliance model, a non-animal test method currently under review by FDA, is an important research tool, but should not be included in the anticaries monograph due to "considerable model heterogeneity, lack of validation data and lack of reliability," company maintains in recent comments to agency. P&G is "firmly committed" to developing testing alternatives to animal caries model, firm notes. CTFA/CHPA have encouraged FDA to evaluate multiple alternative test methods in joint comments to the agency (1"The Rose Sheet" July 22, 2002, p. 8). Comments were submitted in response to FDA's request for data on the IOA model in October (2"The Rose Sheet" Oct. 22, 2001, p. 7)...

Anticaries test alternatives

Inclusion of validated in vitro pH cycling model in the OTC Anticaries Products Monograph as alternative to animal caries testing is urged by Procter & Gamble. Intraoral Appliance model, a non-animal test method currently under review by FDA, is an important research tool, but should not be included in the anticaries monograph due to "considerable model heterogeneity, lack of validation data and lack of reliability," company maintains in recent comments to agency. P&G is "firmly committed" to developing testing alternatives to animal caries model, firm notes. CTFA/CHPA have encouraged FDA to evaluate multiple alternative test methods in joint comments to the agency (1"The Rose Sheet" July 22, 2002, p. 8). Comments were submitted in response to FDA's request for data on the IOA model in October (2"The Rose Sheet" Oct. 22, 2001, p. 7)...

IOA Anticaries Test Alternative To Be Reviewed By FDA Advisory Committee

An FDA advisory committee will explore whether or not the Intraoral Appliance (IOA) model should be permitted in place of animal caries studies currently required in the OTC anticaries monograph, FDA says in a 1March 15 Federal Register notice

Related Content

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS010457

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel