Aussie Nad’s “No Hair” Claim Needs Qualification, NAD Urges
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
Aussie U.S. Corp should qualify its advertising and labeling claims for Nad's No-Heat Hair Removal Gel to better reflect the company's intended message, the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus concludes
You may also be interested in...
Regulatory In Brief
Wella buy gets green light: Federal Trade Commission grants regulatory approval to Procter & Gamble to proceed with its planned acquisition of German beauty firm Wella. P&G continues to pursue necessary regulatory and governmental approvals in other major markets including the EU, firm notes. P&G owns 79.17% of total registered share capital and about 84.9% of the value of outstanding shares of Wella following the close of the second and final tender period in June (1"The Rose Sheet" June 30, 2003, Finance In Brief)...
OCA Applauds Organic Board's Recommendation To USDA: "Outlaw Nanotech"
With a push from the Organic Consumers Association, the National Organic Standards Board is recommending that the use of nanotechnology be strictly prohibited from products certified under the National Organic Program