CTFA on security
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
"It is very important to emphasize" FDA's draft security guidance for cosmetics processors and transporters should not be considered minimum standards that every cosmetics company must meet, Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association states in May 20 comments to the agency. "Because of the diversity of the industry, all of the guidance may not be applicable to every company, CTFA adds. Association claims FDA's guidelines are "remarkably consistent" with its own Product Security and Tampering Incident guidelines and says it supports efforts by FDA to encourage regulated industries to be attentive to product security. FDA's draft guidelines, released in March, recommend random plant security inspections (1"The Rose Sheet" March 24, 2003, p. 6)...
You may also be interested in...
CFSAN Simplifies Guidance For Secure Cosmetic Manufacturing With “Tool”
FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition has updated its "Security Preventive Measures Guidance" for cosmetic processors and transporters with a self-assessment tool that helps to simplify the information, the agency announces
Cosmetics Plant Random Security Checks Suggested In FDA Guidance
Random cosmetic plant security inspections are recommended by FDA in a draft guidance for cosmetics processors and transporters announced by the agency March 19
New EU Approvals
The Pink Sheet's list of EU centralized approvals of new active substances has been updated to add two new products, including Ryzneuta, Evive Biotechnology's treatment for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.