HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Prop 65 Limits Point Downward For Lead, Other Reprotoxic Chemicals

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

California issues a pre-regulatory draft rule to amend Prop 65 with a 60% lower maximum allowable dose level for lead in personal care products sold without exposure warnings. The proposal also clarifies that MADLs for listed chemicals are single-day limits, a change that could trigger new warnings and lawsuits.

You may also be interested in...



Prop 65 Safe Harbor For Lead Challenged In CEH Petition

In parallel with a lawsuit brought by the Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation, which seeks to eliminate the safe-harbor level for lead under Proposition 65, the Center for Environmental Health has filed a petition with California OEHHA asking for repeal or amendment of lead's maximum allowable dose level.

Brace For Impact: Lawsuit Challenges Prop 65 Safe Harbor For Lead

Environmental nonprofit contends there is no safe exposure level for lead in a lawsuit challenging the Prop 65 safe harbor for the substance, which has enabled many cosmetics firms to forgo warning labeling in California to date. Attorneys and regulatory experts discuss the suit’s potential large-scale impact while identifying diethanolamine as potentially the cosmetics industry’s next major headache under Prop 65.

Women’s Voices For The Earth Will Keep After CIR, Salon Worker Safety In 2024

Women’s Voices for the Earth continues to call attention to cosmetic ingredients’ potential health impacts on users including salon workers, while pushing the Cosmetic Ingredient Review to consider a wider variety of safety information in its assessment work.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS123316

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel