Consumer Reports Tells FDA: Half Of Sunscreens Perform Short Of SPF Claims
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
The Personal Care Products Council questions Consumer Reports' testing of products' SPF levels, which may not be consistent with FDA standards. Over the four years CR has been testing sunscreens, 48% failed to meet claimed SPFs, with mineral sunscreens testing as particularly unreliable, the magazine says.
You may also be interested in...
Sun Protection Fraud? Class Actions Dispute Brands' Claimed SPFs
Banana Boat owner Edgewell Personal Care is among firms caught up in putative class actions challenging the authenticity of their SPF claims on sunscreen products, with plaintiffs citing Consumer Reports findings as well as their own commissioned tests from independent labs. Attempts to dismiss suits on the basis of preemption arguments or company-owned SPF data have not been successful to date.
Coppertone Heads Off NGO Shade-Throwing With ‘Assurance Assessment’
The Bayer brand commissioned global consulting and standards firm AccountAbility to assess its operations, procedures and testing at the root of Coppertone SPF claims and other labeling aspects. The company now is sharing the results publicly, possibly to get out in front of a conversation that tends to arise this time of year regarding sunscreen safety, effectiveness and truthfulness in marketing.
EWG Sunscreen Concerns Cast Shadow Over 13 Children's Formulas
In its 10th annual sunscreen report, the Environmental Working Group highlights changes the sunscreen market has undergone in the past decade – both positive and negative in the group's view. It also releases its "best" and "worst" sunscreen picks, with a focus on children's products for the first time.