Oral Care, Topical Product 'Natural' Claims Paint Bullseye For Class Action
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
Class action complaints alleging misleading "natural" claims for food products have been stayed pending completion of FDA's look at whether it should formally define the term for use in food, but there is no parallel FDA consideration of how the term is used for oral care products and topicals.
You may also be interested in...
2016 In Review: ‘Free Of’ Claims, Ingredient Snafus Breed Controversy
Undeclared ingredient use by Ava Anderson Non Toxic and the presence of sodium lauryl sulfate in Honest Company products, contrary to its “free of” claims, led to the former’s collapse and class action litigation against the latter in 2016. Meanwhile, “natural” marketing continues to be a risky business, with FTC stepping up enforcement action last year and efforts underway to promote clearer legal standards.
Tom's Of Maine Appealing NAD-Advised Name Change For Naturally Dry Antiperspirant
Tom's of Maine's Naturally Dry Antiperspirant represents a misleading natural claim given that the product’s active wetness-control ingredient is an extensively processed aluminum salt, NAD says, siding with challenger Unilever. Colgate will appeal the decision, arguing that the claims at issue are subject to a 2015 court order and therefore the dispute falls outside of NAD’s jurisdiction.
FTC Action Against 'All Natural' Claims Likely To 'Embolden' Plaintiffs
Attorneys agree that FTC's announced settlements with personal-care companies for misleading "all-natural" claims likely will not be helpful to class-action defendants making primary-jurisdiction arguments and could actually spur more litigation, similar to trends following FDA warning letters.