Colgate/Tom’s Of Maine Pays Back Unilever For ‘Naturally Dry’ Loss
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
It appears that Unilever will have to repackage Schmidt’s deodorants without wetness-absorption claims following an NAD ruling upheld by an appellate review panel. Challenger Colgate/Tom’s of Maine must be pleased, as it was Unilever that took down Tom’s “Naturally Dry” claims (and product names) in the same advertising self-regulatory forum in 2016.
You may also be interested in...
NAD Dispute Over Native Deodorant Claims Raises Question: Is Wetness Protection Exclusive To Antiperspirants?
Colgate’s Tom’s of Maine continues efforts to police natural deodorant advertising, challenging wetness-protection claims from P&G’s Native brand in the National Advertising Division’s self-regulatory forum. Siding with Tom’s, the NAD focused on the adequacy of Native’s evidence, but the case also has FDA regulatory implications and could impact other P&G brands, namely Secret. Native is appealing the NAD’s decision.
Unilever And Givaudan Buy Natural; More Cosmetics M&A In Brief
Schmidt's Naturals will bring a new flavor to Unilever's deodorant portfolio under a deal announced Dec. 14; Givaudan says Expressions Parfumées "will fit nicely with our 2020 strategy to expand our presence with local and regional customers, and grow our capabilities in natural ingredients." More news in brief.
Tom’s ‘Naturally Dry’ Claims Survived Class Action, Only To Perish At NAD
Companies that have settled lawsuits regarding the truthfulness of “natural” or other claims should take note of the National Advertising Review Board’s decision on jurisdictional issues raised last year by Colgate. The firm argued unsuccessfully that the National Advertising Division should not have reviewed Tom’s of Maine Naturally Dry antiperspirant claims because they were the subject of a court-approved class settlement.