Cosmetics Firms Must Scrutinize Supply Chain Amid Growing Reputational Risks
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
In today’s cosmetics market where manufacturers increasingly are sourcing commodity-based ingredients to answer natural product demand, risk of being linked to social or environmental ills is higher than ever, a Verisk Maplecroft analyst suggests.
You may also be interested in...
Unilever Targets Sustainable Palm Oil Alternative With $120m Biotech Deal
Unilever PLC partners with biotechnology company Genomatica to fund and scale plant-based alternatives to palm oil for personal care and cleaning products.
P&G Commits To No Deforestation For Palm Oil Post-Greenpeace Report
Following a Greenpeace report accusing P&G of greenwashing its operations and contributing to ecological ills with its palm-oil sourcing, the Cincinnati-based firm commits to achieving “no deforestation” in its supply chain by 2020. P&G expects plans from suppliers by the end of 2015 and will begin working with small local farmers in the interim to bring their practices up to the new “unequivocal” standards.
P&G Investigates Greenpeace Claims Against Palm Oil Suppliers
Procter & Gamble is launching an investigation into a report by Greenpeace claiming the firm sources palm oil from suppliers or third parties involved in deforestation in Indonesia. The Cincinnati-based firm says it takes the allegations “very seriously” and is acting upon them, while the NGO says the company has greenwashed its efforts so far and should commit to making “real guarantees” in promoting sustainability.