FDA Guarded On California Animal-Testing Ban’s Implications For Federal Cosmetics Compliance
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
The agency isn’t saying much about California’s new law, but it has indicated previously that alternative methods may not hold up under federal regulatory scrutiny should safety issues arise. FDA and other regulators also have noted that manufacturers’ liability when relying on experimental safety assessment techniques has yet to be tested in the courts.
You may also be interested in...
Regulatory Acceptance Of Non-Animal Test Methods Holding Back Cosmetics Innovation
“Companies can innovate right now, and they have confidence in these tools, these [non-animal] approaches, and they feel they can put these products on the market safely,” said Erin Hill, CEO and president of the International Collaboration on Cosmetics Safety. “The holdup is that they can’t register these new products, because there’s a lack of confidence in the regulatory community.”
2018 In Review: California, Hawaii Pass Personal-Care Legislation Among 300+ State Bills Overall
On par with 2017, the Personal Care Products Council was tracking more than 300 state bills last year with potential implications for its members, including measures ultimately enacted by California and Hawaii to deter cosmetic animal testing and ban environmentally questionable sunscreens.
Cruelty Free International’s China Entry Pilot Enrolls Edgewell’s Bulldog, Neal’s Yard Remedies
Australian company Subtle Energies and UK-based 7th Heaven round out the group of cruelty-free cosmetics brands selected for participation in CFI’s pilot program, which organizers say is not only greasing the skids for aspiring China market entrants that want to avoid animal testing, but also spurring discussion about alternative testing methods.