'Natural’ Versus ‘Nature Inspired’: UK Ad Regulator Rules In Competitive Dispute
Executive Summary
The oft-raised question of how consumers interpret natural claims has come up again in the Advertising Standards Authority’s dispute resolution forum in the UK. PZ Cussons, which markets Original Source shower gel with “100% Natural Fragrance,” brought a challenge against Unilever/Radox, targeting the latter’s “100% Nature Inspired Fragrance” claim on similar products.
You may also be interested in...
Is Clinique’s ‘Fresh Pressed’ A Natural Claim? UK’s Ad Authority Issues Ruling
Fushi Wellbeing – which markets a range of organic, fresh-pressed face oils derived from the cherry seed, baobab seed and argan nut, among other natural sources – challenged Clinique’s Fresh Pressed line name in light of the brand’s heavy reliance on chemically derived ingredients.
Kiss My Face ‘Natural’ Suit Aims To Stretch Materiality Of FTC Actions
A putative class action in California’s Northern District alleges that KMF’s “nourish naturally” claim on body wash and lotion packaging is deceptive due to the presence of synthetic ingredients that the Federal Trade Commission cited in actions against skin-care marketers last year. Importantly, however, the FTC cases targeted “all-natural” or “100% natural” assertions, as opposed to unqualified “natural” references.
National Advertising Division Shuts Down Skincarebrandsreviews Website
NourishMax agreed to discontinue “top pick” claims for its Diamond Infused Eye Cream and fold up its website that looked suspiciously to NAD like advertising in the guise of independent, honest reviews.