HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

CTFA’s Supreme Court connection

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Supreme Court nominee John Roberts maintains he failed to include prior lobbying work on behalf of the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association on a recent Senate questionnaire because his conversations with government attorneys at the time "were focused on the prospect of litigation" in Aug. 3 letter to Senate Judiciary Ranking Democrat Patrick Leahy (Vt.). Letter follows media reports Roberts neglected to list the stint. As an attorney with Hogan & Hartson in 2001, he was retained to help CTFA lobby FDA to change proposed labeling requirements in the OTC sunscreen final monograph, Roberts writes, adding he was "asked to prepare a legal analysis of how the proposed regulation would violate the First Amendment" and advise FDA the rule would trigger litigation. Roberts, former CTFA President Ed Kavanaugh and VP-Legal & General Counsel Tom Donegan attended an Oct. 29, 2001 meeting with FDA officials, after which the effective date for the sunscreen final rule was delayed (1"The Rose Sheet" Dec. 3, 2001, In Brief)...

You may also be interested in...



Sunscreen monograph effective date delay

FDA plans to publish notice further delaying effective date for sunscreen final monograph by the end of December, agency says in a recently-released meeting memorandum. The current compliance date is Dec. 31, 2002. During an Oct. 29 meeting with CTFA, the agency said it plans to postpone effective date and consider a number of issues raised by the association, memo notes. CTFA requested: elimination of limits on SPF claims; elimination of restrictions on anti-aging claims for sunscreens; broader selection of approved uses and directions; and relief from some labeling requirements for all sunscreens, skin protectants and antiperspirants...

Cosmetic And Personal Care Trademark Review: 16 April

Personal care and cosmetic product trademark filings compiled from the Official Gazette of the US Patent and Trademark Office, Class 3.

Health And Wellness Weekly Trademarks Review: 16 April

Trademarks are registered and published for opposition with the US Patent and Trademark Office and are published weekly in the agency's Official Gazette.

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS013249

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel