HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Dietary Ingredient Identity Testing Exemptions Remain A Puzzle

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

The trade groups ask FDA to keep open the door for supplement firms to petition for 100% identity testing exemptions under an IFR published in 2007. AHPA and NPA say supplement manufacturers have insufficient guidance on information the agency expects in petitions for identity testing waivers.

You may also be interested in...



GMP Interim Final Rule Sets Bar High For 100% Testing Exemption – Experts

Firms "rarely" will meet the scientific rationale FDA included in an interim final rule to substantiate petitions for exemption from 100 percent ingredient identity testing required in the dietary supplement good manufacturing practices, according to food and drug law expert Scott Bass

California Bill To Age-Restrict Sales Of Diet Pills Further Along Than Other States’ Legislation

CA, MA and NJ legislatures remain in session with bills active proposing regulations similar to NY law effective 22 April requiring retailers, including online, to ask for proof of age when customers buying consumer health products containing ingredients labeled or promoted for weight loss and bodybuilding benefits appear younger than 18.

CRN Has Standing For Steep Hill To Climb Challenging New York's Age-Restricted Sales

Federal judge finds “misreading of the legislation” in CRN’s argument that state “restricts access based purely on what has been said about the product or its ingredients.” But standing to challenge “means that only CRN is positioned right now to go before the court on behalf of industry,” says CEO Steve Mister.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS123507

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel