ECHA Advises Read-Across Know-How, Only 'Last Resort' Animal Testing
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
ECHA's progress report on REACH evaluations conducted in 2015 identifies priority targets in its compliance checks and common shortcomings in registrants' dossiers. With new animal testing under the microscope, the agency provides guidance on using (Q)SARs to fill data gaps, as well as insight into its approach to assessing read-across, to assist companies readying for the May 31, 2018 registration deadline.
You may also be interested in...
ECHA Report: 91% Of Evaluated Chemical Dossiers Came Up Short In 2016
The European Chemicals Agency conducted 183 new compliance checks in 2016, yielding 168 requests for additional information to cover data gaps. The agency expects that the final REACH deadline for phase-in substances – May 31, 2018 – will generate the largest number of dossier submissions yet, including from many inexperienced SMEs, making its guidance and companies’ preparatory work all the more important.
CIR Panel Looks To Establish Guidelines For Read-Across Use
At its December meeting in Washington, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel finalized safety assessments for eight ingredients and advanced three other reports. In its reviews, the group made selective use of read-across data while agreeing to discuss protocol for employing the predictive approach in future reviews.
ECHA May Be Stickler In 2018 For ‘Last Resort’ Animal Tests Only
Requests for firms’ rationale behind animal tests and referrals to EU members states to investigate possible noncompliance may be more frequent under REACH going forward, following a European Ombudsman decision finding the European Chemicals Agency’s interpretation of its related duties “excessively restrictive.” PETA UK lodged a complaint in 2012 charging ECHA with maladministration of REACH, specifically the “last resort” principle for animal experimentation.