Oral Care, Topical Product 'Natural' Claims Paint Bullseye For Class Action
This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet
Executive Summary
Class action complaints alleging misleading "natural" claims for food products have been stayed pending completion of FDA's look at whether it should formally define the term for use in food, but there is no parallel FDA consideration of how the term is used for oral care products and topicals.
You may also be interested in...
Tom's Of Maine Ingredients' Efficacy Weighed Against 'Natural' Claim In NAD Review
Tom's of Maine's Naturally Dry Antiperspirant complies with FDA requirement that antiperspirants contain an aluminum salt-based active ingredient, but NAD says “naturally dry” misleads by implying that natural ingredients are responsible for product’s effectiveness. Brand owner Colgate also says an earlier class action settlement of "identical" ad claims precludes a NAD review.
FTC Action On 'All Natural' Claims Likely To 'Embolden' Plaintiffs
Attorneys agree that FTC's announced settlements with personal-care companies for misleading "all-natural" claims likely will not be helpful to class-action defendants making primary-jurisdiction arguments and could actually spur more litigation, similar to trends following FDA warning letters.
FDA Compelled To Test ‘Natural’ Climate But Hedges On Rulemaking Forecast
FDA notes three citizen petitions asking the agency to define “natural” for use in food labeling and one asking it to prohibit the term on labels in addition to federal courts requesting administrative determinations,. But a rulemaking might not be the outcome, and any decision will be a long time in coming.