FDA Plans For Soy Health Claims, Pyridoxamine's Use Questioned By CRN, NPA
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
FDA’s proposed rule to revoke soy protein heart health ignores research supporting the claims and cites evidence that isn't compelling, CRN an NPA say in comments to the agency. CRN also submits comments supporting an ingredient firm's petition asking FDA to remove any uncertainty about the of use of pyridoxamine as a dietary ingredient.
You may also be interested in...
Cannabinoids Are Test Case For US FDA Advisors’ ‘Predicted Pharmacological Activity’ Discussion
Busy agenda of disparate topics in one-day meeting likely valuable for informing FDA on safety of hemp ingredients but not for moving toward a regulatory pathway for the ingredients' lawful use in supplements and food.
Omega-3 Heart Health Claims Decision: FDA Out Of Step With Industry?
"The reality is that the FDA remains unwilling to rely upon a meta-analysis of only the highest quality studies in order to guide its final decision," GOED VP Harry Rice. "I think FDA has really lost sight of how the dietary supplement industry has changed," says attorney Charles Jolly.
Pyridoxamine Petition Paints Better Option As Dietary Ingredient Than IND
ViGuard Health says in a petition that with two IND programs for studies of pyridoxamine's potential therapeutic use formally withdrawn, FDA should rescind its 2009 decision that it did not qualify as a dietary ingredient.