HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Rx PEG Firms Give FDA Deadline Before Asking Court To Delay ANDA Withdrawals

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet & The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Breckenridge Pharmaceuticals and Nexgen Pharma file a citizen petition asking FDA to delay effective date for the agency's order that withdrawing approval of all abbreviated new drug applications for Rx generic polyethylene glycol 3350 laxatives. Absent quick reply, the companies may seek emergency court action.

You may also be interested in...



FDA Rejects Arguments On Keeping Rx PEG Products Available

FDA responded to arguments in its proposed order denying drug firms’ requests to allow their RX polyethylene glycol 3350 products to remain on the market. Among the arguments, all rejected by FDA, was that a prescription PEG 3350 should be available for use by pediatric patients and that the product is not safe OTC for elderly consumers.

California Bill To Age-Restrict Sales Of Diet Pills Further Along Than Other States’ Legislation

CA, MA and NJ legislatures remain in session with bills active proposing regulations similar to NY law effective 22 April requiring retailers, including online, to ask for proof of age when customers buying consumer health products containing ingredients labeled or promoted for weight loss and bodybuilding benefits appear younger than 18.

CRN Has Standing For Steep Hill To Climb Challenging New York's Age-Restricted Sales

Federal judge finds “misreading of the legislation” in CRN’s argument that state “restricts access based purely on what has been said about the product or its ingredients.” But standing to challenge “means that only CRN is positioned right now to go before the court on behalf of industry,” says CEO Steve Mister.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS122572

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel