HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

PEG 3350 Laxatives: FDA Allows Firms 6 Months To Make Their Case For Rx Products

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet & The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

FDA agrees with Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Nexgen Pharma, Lannett Co. and Paddock Labs that ending availability of their Rx PEG 3350 products on May 2 would cause a shortage of the drug available to consumers. Saying "it likely would be difficult for manufacturers of OTC PEG 3350 products to compensate for the removal" of the Rx drugs by that date, FDA extends the deadline to Nov. 2.

You may also be interested in...



Rx PEG Firms Give FDA Deadline Before Asking Court To Delay ANDA Withdrawals

Breckenridge Pharmaceuticals and Nexgen Pharma file a citizen petition asking FDA to delay effective date for the agency's order that withdrawing approval of all abbreviated new drug applications for Rx generic polyethylene glycol 3350 laxatives. Absent quick reply, the companies may seek emergency court action.

FDA Rejects Arguments On Keeping Rx PEG Products Available

FDA responded to arguments in its proposed order denying drug firms’ requests to allow their RX polyethylene glycol 3350 products to remain on the market. Among the arguments, all rejected by FDA, was that a prescription PEG 3350 should be available for use by pediatric patients and that the product is not safe OTC for elderly consumers.

Abbott's ‘Bedrock Of Good Health’ Nutritionals Business Faces Mounting Infant Formula Litigation

Nutritional product business had 5.1% Q1 sales growth and is like Abbott’s other segments, “super well-aligned to the global demographics and trends in health care,” says CEO Ford. But as it defends complaints of damages from powder formulas made at facility found with unsafe levels of bacterial contaminants, Abbott’s also targeted in litigation alleging failure to warn about risk of infants born prematurely developing necrotizing enterocolitis if fed cow’s milk-based formula.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS122570

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel