California’s Cruelty-Free Cosmetics Act Makes New Ingredients Officially Endangered
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
It’s debatable the extent to which SB 1249, now headed to the governor’s desk, will improve animals’ lot, but cosmetic ingredient innovation is almost certain to suffer. Industry could escalate efforts behind alternative methods development, or there’s another possible solution: federal preemption.
You may also be interested in...
Canada’s Cosmetic Animal-Testing Ban: What It Means For China Testing, New Ingredients, USA
Canada’s prohibitions on cosmetic animal testing enter into force in December, largely in line with EU, California and other bans around the globe, but with some notable distinctions. “Now it's really time to increase the pressure in the US – action can't be far behind,” says Brandi Halls, chief ethics officer at Lush Cosmetics, North America.
Industry Should Seek Guidance, Supply-Chain Checks For California Cruelty-Free Compliance
Morgan Lewis partner Kathleen Sanzo discusses California’s Cruelty-Free Cosmetics Act, signed into law in late September. Companies should begin establishing compliance programs and supply chain controls and request guidance from California authorities on interpreting the law’s exemptions, she says.
CFI Sets Sights On US, Global Bans To ‘Close The Door’ On Cosmetic Animal Testing
California’s passage of the Cruelty-Free Cosmetics Act could trigger a state-level domino effect leading to a federal ban, according to Cruelty Free International’s North America Campaign Manager Monica Engebretson. Meanwhile, the NGO will continue to push for a global ban through the United Nations.