2018 In Review: California, Hawaii Pass Personal-Care Legislation Among 300+ State Bills Overall
Executive Summary
On par with 2017, the Personal Care Products Council was tracking more than 300 state bills last year with potential implications for its members, including measures ultimately enacted by California and Hawaii to deter cosmetic animal testing and ban environmentally questionable sunscreens.
You may also be interested in...
California’s Toxic Free Cosmetics Act And The Case For Iconclad Federal Preemption
Limited to no federal preemption is included in cosmetics bills under consideration in the 116th Congress, which means that even if one were to pass in its current form, companies could still be at the mercy of states, typically California, imposing unique bans or restrictions on cosmetic ingredients.
2018 In Review: US Midterm Mania Stifles Cosmetics Regulatory Reform Momentum
Despite repeated stakeholder assertions of being “closer than ever” to modernizing cosmetics regulations, the 115th Congress ended with reform legislation stranded in committee. The Personal Care Products says midterm elections diverted lawmakers’ attention from unresolved issues, likely including possible preemption terms to put a lid on growing state and local requirements.
Key West Weighing Oxybenzone/Octinoxate Sunscreen Ban Per Hawaii’s Example
The Florida island city could be the next jurisdiction to prohibit the sale of oxybenzone- and octinoxate-containing sunscreens. Industry maintains that available science does not clearly link the ingredients to coral decline, with the Personal Care Products Council asking to present before the Key West City Commission at its January meeting.