HBW Insight is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

State/local regs that differ from federal standards "not needed" -- CTFA testimony.

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

STATE/LOCAL REGS THAT DIFFER FROM FEDERAL STANDARDS "NOT NEEDED," Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association outside counsel Peter Barton Hutt of the Washington, D.C. law firm Covington & Burling testified at a House Commerce/Health and Environment subcommittee hearing on FDA reform. Hutt spoke in defense of HR 3200, the food portion of the House FDA reform package, which includes language supporting national uniformity and the revision of the Delaney clause, on behalf of CTFA, the Grocery Manufacturers of America and the Nonprescription Drug Manufacturers Association.
Advertisement
Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS002790

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel