HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

P&G/Sassoon suit

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Vidal Sassoon's claims of breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud against Procter & Gamble are invalid, as both are contingent upon a fiduciary agreement which does not exist between the parties, P&G maintains in a Sept. 8 filing in a Los Angeles district court. Brief intended to support P&G's earlier motion to dismiss a complaint lodged by hair stylist Vidal Sassoon, filed in June (1"The Rose Sheet" Aug. 11, 2003, p. 5). The founder of the Vidal Sassoon brand had challenged P&G's efforts to dismiss the case in August, stating the firm's motion failed to meet legal standards for the action. The motion to dismiss is scheduled to be heard by the court on Oct. 20...
Advertisement
Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS011531

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel