Banned Substances May Be Sticking Point In TTIP Cosmetics Negotiations
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Divergent regulatory approaches in the U.S. and EU and the jurisdictions’ dramatically lopsided lists of banned cosmetic substances have complicated negotiations on potential regulatory alignments in the cosmetics sector under the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Talks continue to explore “if a substance has been approved in the European Union following a risk assessment, it can be taken into account by the U.S. regulators,” EU Chief Negotiator Ignacio Garcia Bercero said.
You may also be interested in...
As negotiators from the U.S. and the European Commission continue discussing ways to further trade between the two regions as part of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, the EC recommends a “regulatory convergence” for the cosmetics sector. In a position paper, the EC proposes mutual recognition of lists of prohibited and allowed substances in cosmetics, among other measures.
Cosmetics Industry Awaits ‘Critical’ Safety Assessment Clarification Under China’s New Framework Reg
The China State Council’s January approval of an overarching Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulation promises to bring about long-awaited reforms. But draft regulations targeted for release in coming months will be key to the implementation of CSAR provisions, the Personal Care Products Council says.
As European industry’s concerns grow about “politicization” of regulatory programs, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement’s cosmetics annex directs regulatory authorities pursuing new rules to give due consideration to scientific and technical guidance documents developed through international collaboration.