HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Supreme Court May Hear Cosmetics Case Exploring Federal Preemption

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

The United States Solicitor General is expected to file a brief early in 2015 on a case examining if the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act preempts an unfair competition claim in California pertaining to the cosmetics/drugs regulatory divide. The case, Athena Cosmetics vs. Allergan, could be heard by the Supreme Court and bring attention to the way cosmetics are defined and regulated under federal law.

You may also be interested in...

Any More Athenas Out There? Plaintiffs May Allege So In Expected Suits

Firms marketing cosmetics with drug-like properties could be targeted increasingly by suits requiring courts, and even juries, to interpret their regulatory status if the Supreme Court's decision not to hear Athena Cosmetics v. Allergan is seen as an invitation by consumers and the plaintiffs' bar.

Supreme Court Review Of Athena Cosmetics Case, Federal Preemption Argument Unlikely

Federal food and drug law does not impliedly preempt Allergan's suit against Athena Cosmetics alleging that the defendant's RevitaLash products compete unfairly against the drug firm's Latisse treatment in California, according to a brief filed by Solicitor General Donald Verrilli with the Supreme Court. Athena has argued that the absence of FDA action against its eyelash enhancers signals that their cosmetic positioning is lawful, but Verrilli disagrees, maintaining that such litigation can supplement rather than conflict with FDA regulation.

In Brief: Prop 65 Aloe Vera Listing Update; Beautycounter Sales Soar; More

Comments are now being accepted through June 9 on California's proposal to add Aloe vera whole leaf extract to the Prop 65 substances list. More news in brief.

Related Content

Related Companies




Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts