Natural Brands Work To Deter Lawsuits, Some More Successfully Than Others
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Johnson & Johnson and Hain Celestial brands are among those whose natural personal-care claims have resulted in costly lawsuits in the U.S., while other leading natural players have been more successful in avoiding litigation. Abstaining from absolute natural assertions, defining the parameters of natural claims in the context of marketing materials and certifying offerings to private natural standards are tactics that may help, though ultimately there are no guarantees in this largely unregulated landscape at present.
You may also be interested in...
CBD Suits Challenge ‘THC-Free’ Claims After Users Fail Drug Tests; Plaintiffs Bar May Just Be Warming Up
Attorneys are warning CBD product marketers to be on guard for litigation challenging the authenticity of their claims, the safety of their products and other aspects of their businesses. So far, suits of this nature have been limited in the US, but the few known cases could be harbingers of a larger wave to come.
The firm failed in motions to dismiss plaintiff claims and block class certification in a suit alleging that Aveeno Active Naturals products are falsely advertised because they contain synthetic ingredients. Meanwhile, class certification was granted recently in a separate case concerning Aveeno Baby "natural" claims, which could portend another settlement to come.
Attorneys agree that FTC's announced settlements with personal-care companies for misleading "all-natural" claims likely will not be helpful to class-action defendants making primary-jurisdiction arguments and could actually spur more litigation, similar to trends following FDA warning letters.