HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


What Comes First In FDA Land, Excessive Claims Finding Or Facility Inspection?

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Recent warning letters to Reviva Labs and Ageless Derma manufacturer Crescent Health Center cite claims violations brought to FDA's attention through inspections of the companies' manufacturing facilities. It's possible, however, that conspicuous website claims that overstep cosmetic boundaries are prompting inspections – further reason for companies to keep their claims in check.

You may also be interested in...

‘Ant-type Insects’ And Expired Ingredients: FDA Warns Bioque Following Inspection

Agency inspectors observed a range of insanitary conditions and practices at the Blacksburg, Virginia-based manufacturing site that turns out Bioque and Vouray skin-care products, causing the products to be adulterated, according to an FDA warning letter.

FDA Warning Letter Depicts Personal-Care Regulation's Present, Possible Future

Cosmetic firms already are being closely watched by FDA for overreaching product claims, but if formal good manufacturing practices are established for the sector down the road under regulatory reform legislation, companies could be targeted increasingly with warning letters like that issued to Beauty & Health International for quality-control violations at its Garden Grove, California facility.

FDA Warns Reviva Labs For Collagen-Building, Anti-Inflammatory Claims

FDA cites Reviva for unapproved drug claims on eight of its products marketed as cosmetics. Included among targeted claims are familiar statements about collagen production, inflammation reduction and other benefits the agency views as structure/function effects. A number of the claims onceivably could be allowed under the revised "cosmetic" definition proposed by the Cosmetic Modernization Amendments of 2015.

Related Content





Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts