PCPC Statement On Cosmetics Reform Legislation Hints At Potential Compromises
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
The Personal Care Products Council outlines a list of “principles” that it believes should guide legislation to update cosmetics regulations. Many of its priorities could be seen as aligning more closely with reintroduced House legislation than the less industry-friendly Personal Care Products Safety Act in the previous Senate, signaling a possible change in strategic direction at PCPC under the new Administration.
You may also be interested in...
The New Jersey Democrat introduced multiple cosmetics-related amendments during the House Health Subcommittee's markup of draft OTC monograph reform legislation. While ultimately nothing came of the proposed measures, it's clear that Pallone remains intent on updating cosmetics regulations to require facility registration, adverse event reporting and good manufacturing practices, among other aims.
Under the Toxic-Free Kids Act, notifications and fees are due to the Oregon Health Authority by the start of the new year from manufacturers of children's products that contain state-listed ingredients or contaminants. The Rose Sheet examines how Oregon's chemical reporting program, and others like it around the US, would be impacted by preemption clauses in proposed federal legislation to update cosmetics regulations.
The Independent Cosmetic Manufacturers and Distributors calls Republican Senator Orrin Hatch's FDA Cosmetic Safety and Modernization Act "a step in the right direction," echoing the Personal Care Products Council's take on the proposal, signaling potential for industry solidarity at an auspicious moment in Washington.