HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

US House Cosmetics Hearing: Preemption, FDA Ingredient Review Could Be Regulatory Reform Snags

Executive Summary

Federal preemption of state and local requirements that differ from federal mandates came up repeatedly at the House Energy & Commerce Health Subcommittee’s 4 December cosmetics hearing. Meanwhile, both NGO and industry stakeholders generally support FDA review of cosmetic ingredients, but the details of such a framework likely will be contentious as work progresses.

You may also be interested in...



Cosmetics Industry Stakeholders Not Thrilled About Senate Reform Bill, And Why Should They Be?

In HBW Insight’s conversations with industry advocates about legislation in the US Senate to reform US cosmetics regulations, frustrations with the process have been palpable. Stakeholders suggest that science and proportionality are taking back seats to politics and that concerns about costs to industry, which ultimately could be passed on to consumers, are not being taken seriously enough.

Senate HELP Floats Draft For US Cosmetics Reform; Top Trade Groups Hustle To Respond

Bundled within the draft FDA Safety and Landmark Enhancements Act are federal cosmetics reform provisions that would require facility registration and product listings with the US FDA, adverse event reporting and good manufacturing practices, while empowering the agency to order product recalls, access company records, and suspend dangerous operations.

CIR ‘Watchdog’ Women’s Voices For The Earth To Remain On Guard In 2021

NGO says the Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety’s conclusion on methylisothiazolinone in 2020 was among decisions “not in the interest of public health.” However, other assessments highlighted by the group suggest that the Cosmetic Ingredient Review is working as an open forum for public input and discussion.

Related Content

Topics

Latest News
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS149491

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel